<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why StumbleUpon&#8217;s Traffic is Better Than Digg&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webrampage.com/why-stumbleupons-traffic-is-better-than-diggs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webrampage.com/why-stumbleupons-traffic-is-better-than-diggs/</link>
	<description>Keepin&#039; it real on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 01:56:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Love'J~</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/why-stumbleupons-traffic-is-better-than-diggs/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>~Love'J~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=457#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>yes i need to figure this one out 2 ... but like d concept... ^.^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes i need to figure this one out 2 &#8230; but like d concept&#8230; ^.^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/why-stumbleupons-traffic-is-better-than-diggs/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=457#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>Great post th13rteen and good point Josh. I also think that SU traffic is of better quality, as visitors from SU tend to stay longer on the website and go visit more pages than diggers. I personnaly got a bigger spike from Stumble Upon than Digg Front page by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post th13rteen and good point Josh. I also think that SU traffic is of better quality, as visitors from SU tend to stay longer on the website and go visit more pages than diggers. I personnaly got a bigger spike from Stumble Upon than Digg Front page by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: th13rteen</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/why-stumbleupons-traffic-is-better-than-diggs/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>th13rteen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=457#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Josh I never thought of that. Yeah that is so true. Thanks for sharing that with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh I never thought of that. Yeah that is so true. Thanks for sharing that with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/why-stumbleupons-traffic-is-better-than-diggs/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=457#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>I guess it depends more on what your website is. If your content is news-type stuff, then Digg is more suitable. StumbleUpon is more suited to &quot;sticky&quot;, timeless content, like entire websites or games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it depends more on what your website is. If your content is news-type stuff, then Digg is more suitable. StumbleUpon is more suited to &#8220;sticky&#8221;, timeless content, like entire websites or games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
