<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>webrampage &#187; digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webrampage.com/tag/digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webrampage.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:09:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Digg: Hoping For Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/2010/08/05/new-digg-hoping-for-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webrampage.com/2010/08/05/new-digg-hoping-for-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Islam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tokiodish.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you&#8217;ve noticed Digg is working on switching over to a new system, so they&#8217;re currently not accepting any user registrations. Some of my friend have been waiting patiently to open accounts, but thank god I already have an account for myself. Now I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s in store for the new Digg v4, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you&#8217;ve noticed Digg is working on switching over to a new system, so they&#8217;re currently not accepting any user registrations. Some of my friend have been waiting patiently to open accounts, but thank god I already have an <a href="http://digg.com/users/momosuxx">account</a> for myself.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-139" title="New Digg Coming Soon" src="http://tokiodish.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/new-digg.png" alt="" width="500" height="245" /></p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s in store for the new Digg v4, but I&#8217;m only hoping that it is more democratic and that it allows the average user a fair chance to get their submissions to the front page. Like seriously the front page is like run by a handful of power users. Very unfair. And for that fact Digg has been <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/digg.com/">losing a lot of users</a> steadily over the past year.</p>
<p>The new Digg&#8217;s Twitter-like layout and everything looks much more social and cleaner, but we can only hope that everyone get&#8217;s a fair shot and not get abused by people trying to game Digg or the power users. Only time will tell and till then lets keep our fingers crossed.</p>
<p>And be sure to check out this preview by <a href="http://twitter.com/KEVINROSE">Kevin Rose</a> (founder of Digg):</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="306" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y9rc-Ou6814&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="306" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y9rc-Ou6814&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-138"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webrampage.com/2010/08/05/new-digg-hoping-for-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Digg a Retard Or a Communist?</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/19/is-digg-a-retard-or-a-communist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/19/is-digg-a-retard-or-a-communist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Islam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digg was hunting down script users, but they kicked it up a notch and went on a banning spree. I got banned too. I thought scripts were okay because MrBabyMan was using scripts and he didn&#8217;t get in trouble. Well I started calling Digg communist because they weren&#8217;t treating people equally. But, then I kept [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a> was <a href="http://www.webrampage.com/watch-out-on-digg/">hunting down</a> script users, but they kicked it up a notch and went on a banning spree. I got banned too. I thought scripts were okay because <a href="http://www.digg.com/users/mrbabyman">MrBabyMan</a> was using scripts and he didn&#8217;t get in trouble.</p>
<p>Well I started calling Digg communist because they weren&#8217;t treating people equally. But, then I kept thinking until my head started hurting and I asked myself &#8220;are they really communist or are they just&#8230; retards?&#8221;<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>I get it that Digg is trying to make it a better place, but this just doesn&#8217;t seem right. You ever heard of this &#8220;the rich get richer and the poor get poorer&#8221;? <strong>Isn&#8217;t Digg bringing in more of the same old domination</strong>? Now what&#8217;s left is the really strong ones (aka diggtators) and the really, really weak ones because <a title="List of all the banned (cool) diggers" href="http://www.thegetsmartblog.com/2008/09/the-grim-reaper-has-visited-digg/">they kicked out</a> most of the &#8220;mid-level&#8221; guys.</p>
<p>And there are some scripts that won&#8217;t show up on the radar. What about them? And <strong>what if we just change the script to digg one submission per minute</strong> when we click the &#8220;Digg all&#8221; button? That will make it almost impossible for the Digg staff to find the script users.</p>
<p>Plus isn&#8217;t this bad for their rep because they&#8217;re just showing everyone how much of a fag they can be? Aren&#8217;t they just scaring the weak, little average diggers? Man I would be digging as slow as I can if I were a newbie. Like what if they banned me for digging too fast?</p>
<p>The Digg staff is just acting like a bunch of kids. You don&#8217;t just do whatever pops up in your head. You need to think about it first. Seriously stop acting all big and tough. Well anyways, its time for the million dollar anwser! So, is Digg a retard of a communist? Both! <strong>They&#8217;re a retarded commie.</strong> But wait! Lets have a little poll here:</p>
<p><script src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/937539.js" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript> &lt;a href =&#8221;http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/937539/&#8221; &gt;What do you think Digg is?&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style=&#8221;font-size:9px;&#8221; mce_style=&#8221;font-size:9px;&#8221;&gt; (&lt;a href =&#8221;http://www.polldaddy.com&#8221;&gt;  polls&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;</noscript></p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-955"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/19/is-digg-a-retard-or-a-communist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submit Your Stuff To Social Bookmarks Yourself</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/15/submit-your-stuff-to-social-bookmarks-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/15/submit-your-stuff-to-social-bookmarks-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Islam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StumbleUpon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Submitting your own stuff to social bookmarking/news sites yourself is like a big no-no to almost everyone (well except for noobs and spammers). They think its selfish and people will hate (aka bury, vote down, etc) on them. Well that maybe true, but I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with that and here&#8217;s why. Lets say you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Submitting your own stuff to social bookmarking/news sites yourself is like a big no-no to almost everyone (well except for noobs and spammers). They think its selfish and people will hate (aka bury, vote down, etc) on them. Well that maybe true, but I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with that and here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>Lets say you write a really good post about advanced SEO. You don&#8217;t submit it to sites like <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a>, <a href="http://www.reddit.com">Reddit</a>, <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com">SU</a>, etc. You just sit back and relax. Now <strong>a total noob comes along and submits it</strong>. Uh oh! You&#8217;re fucked!</p>
<p>Its not always about the traffic. Sometimes you really wanna share something with the world, but too bad, the noob ruined it for you. Wondering why I&#8217;m saying that &#8220;the noob&#8221; ruined it? First of all, the guy is noob! He doesn&#8217;t know how to use the site properly, doesn&#8217;t do a good job with the title, doesn&#8217;t add a good description and he doesn&#8217;t care about promoting it (aka sharing with friends). He just submits it and fucks off.</p>
<p>So, do you get my point? BTW, I was talking about <strong>quality content</strong> (you knew that, right?). I didn&#8217;t mean that its okay for you to submit every single one of your blog posts (for example). I mean the things that make you say to yourself &#8220;man this is some good shit&#8221;. I&#8217;m talking about your masterpieces.</p>
<p>One more tip! Rather than submitting everything yourself, why don&#8217;t you <strong>ask a friend to do it</strong>? That way people won&#8217;t hate on you. But, again keep it to small number of quality content because sometimes you just need to let it go and give people the chance to decide if its worth promoting.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-910"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/15/submit-your-stuff-to-social-bookmarks-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Digg Actually Social?</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/12/is-digg-actually-social/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/12/is-digg-actually-social/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Islam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What makes a site &#8220;social&#8221;? I would say a place where people can share what they like, discover interesting stuff and communicate with friends. And also, democracy! But, does Digg have what it takes to really be a social bookmarking/news site? Hell no! Domination! Well maybe I&#8217;m wrong if you consider a place which is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes a site &#8220;social&#8221;?</p>
<p>I would say a place where people can share what they like, discover interesting stuff and communicate with friends. And also, democracy! But, <strong>does <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a> have what it takes to really be a social bookmarking/news site? </strong>Hell no!</p>
<h3>Domination!</h3>
<p>Well maybe I&#8217;m wrong if you consider a place which is being dominated (and possibly gamed) by a handful of users to be social. I&#8217;m not going to mention names, but you know who they are. Like seriously how is it fair if 90% of the time, the front page has the submissions of those few diggers (more like &#8220;diggtators&#8221;).</p>
<h3>Not a fair fight</h3>
<p>Okay lets look at Digg as a&#8230; sport. We should agree that some people might be better than others. We should be all cool with that. But, what if those people are using things like steroids! Now that&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening over at Digg. <strong>Top diggers are using scripts</strong>.</p>
<p>Maybe you don&#8217;t believe me about the script part. I&#8217;ll show you an example. <a href="http://digg.com/users/MrBabyMan">MrBabyMan</a>, the born-to-be-digg&#8217;s-slave was proved using scripts <a href="http://digg.com/world_news/PLEASE_Ban_MrBabyMan">here</a>, <a href="http://digg.com/comedy/MrBabyMan_Reads_So_Fast">here</a>, and <a href="http://digg.com/comedy/82_diggs_in_3_minutes">here</a>. Plus its not just MrBabyMan, most (actually all) top diggers use scripts too. Just go to their profile and check how many things were dugg within the last few minutes.</p>
<h3>Same old sites hit the front over and over again</h3>
<p>More domination! Not only users are dominating, but sites are too. That&#8217;s just freakin&#8217; unfair! Plus its also bad for Digg. How so? Digg is supposed to be a social news site, right? Its not good if you get the news from only a handful of sources. Its a bit like having Fox News as the only news channel in the world. Uh oh!</p>
<p>Well you might say that those sites are popular and they have a lot of followers and so, they get a lot of diggs. And you&#8217;re right. But, its not that. There&#8217;s something weird. There&#8217;s like something stopping smaller sites from hitting the front page.</p>
<p>One top digger (who wanted to stay anonymous) said, <strong>&#8220;Sites which have never gotten front page before have a hard time. Like REALLY hard&#8221;</strong> and also agreed by saying &#8220;that&#8217;s the theory&#8221; when I asked if the rumours about mods burying things were true.</p>
<h3>Digg has double standards</h3>
<p>Yeah that&#8217;s right, folks. Digg has double standards! Remember how <a title="Check out my post about this" href="http://www.webrampage.com/watch-out-on-digg/">Digg has been banning people</a> for using scripts. Well the people they&#8217;re hunting down are the average diggers. But, what about top diggers like MrBabyMan? He has been proved to use scripts (and got like bitch slapped about it in public).</p>
<p>This other top digger dugg 15 submissions in a minute. Its obvious that he&#8217;s using a script. I don&#8217;t wanna mention his name because&#8230; I&#8217;m nice. Well I mentioned MrBabyMan because by now everyone knows what he&#8217;s been upto.</p>
<h3>So, what is Digg?</h3>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. I guess a place where people worship (aka digg) the top diggers and so does the staff. But, still a place with a bit of good content.</p>
<p>I would really love to see Digg be a better place. I know that Digg&#8217;s trying their best, but seriously, they should treat everyone equally!</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-868"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/12/is-digg-actually-social/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch Out on Digg!</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/04/watch-out-on-digg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/04/watch-out-on-digg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Islam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, that&#8217;s right! You better watch out on Digg. Well actually you don&#8217;t have to watch out since its only for the people who use scripts to digg stuff. Unless you are one of them! Okay so here&#8217;s the deal. Digg officials have been hunting people who use scripts. And do you know what they&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that&#8217;s right! You better watch out on <a title="Go to Digg" href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a>. Well actually you don&#8217;t have to watch out since its only for the people who use scripts to digg stuff. Unless you are one of them!</p>
<p>Okay so here&#8217;s the deal. Digg officials have been hunting people who use scripts. And do you know what they&#8217;re doing after they find an &#8220;evil&#8221; digger? <strong>They ban</strong> him/her. Now that sucks donkey ass. You worked hard to get all those submissions popular, got good loyal friends, got the spotlight on yourself, and other bla blah. But, too bad it all just goes away.</p>
<p>Now are you wondering how they&#8217;ll find out who&#8217;s using scripts or not? Well I&#8217;m pretty sure that the officials get alerted when a particular digger is digging, shouting and deleting shouts at a rate that humans possibly couldn&#8217;t do. For example, digging all the stories on the front page within less than a second.</p>
<p>Oh and if you can&#8217;t login to your account, and you&#8217;re sure the password is correct then you&#8217;re probably banned. And <strong>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll ever unban you</strong>. But, I do know a digger who managed to get himself unbanned. Hold on! He was a power digger. So, don&#8217;t get your hopes up. They couldn&#8217;t care less about unbanning a digger that isn&#8217;t any good to Digg.</p>
<p>So, you better <strong>stop using your little toys</strong> (or at least keep a low profile by doing things at a more&#8230; humanly rate). And post a comment if you got banned, know anyone who got banned and the reason behind getting banned. Plus if you support this or if you&#8217;re pissed off about this.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-811"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/09/04/watch-out-on-digg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obsessed With Social Bookmarking Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/08/08/obsessed-with-social-bookmarking-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/08/08/obsessed-with-social-bookmarking-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Islam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StumbleUpon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webrampage.com/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From time to time, my brain stops working and I can&#8217;t think of what to blog about. Its not exactly writer&#8217;s block. I try to think of something unique to write about. Well I was thinking (for a change) and I realized something important. Its about social bookmarking sites and how obsessed I was with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From time to time, my brain stops working and I can&#8217;t think of what to blog about. Its not exactly writer&#8217;s block. I try to think of something unique to write about. Well I was thinking (for a change) and I realized something important. Its about social bookmarking sites and how obsessed I was with it.</p>
<p>I tried so hard to get on <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a>&#8216;s front page, but I failed. I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s wrong. I tried my best. I guess Digg hates me or something. I got around 250 diggs on a few submissions too. Its not like I got the basics wrong or something. I&#8217;m just not lucky enough.</p>
<p>I submitted <a title="Post about all the CAPTCHAs on Digg" href="http://www.webrampage.com/woah-captchas-all-over-digg/">my second last post</a> to Digg and someone else made a submission about the same topic. It was about all the CAPTCHAs on Digg. Well the other guy was a power digger and his submission made it to the front. Mine didn&#8217;t, of course. I was really pissed off.</p>
<p>Now just a few minutes ago I was thinking of trying to game Digg. No more being a nice guy. Thinking of gaming Digg, <a title="Go to StumbleUpon" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com">SU</a>, etc and grabing some traffic that way. But, then I asked myself what the fuck am I doing? <strong>Why am I so fucking hooked on traffic from social bookmarking sites</strong>? It was completely messed up.</p>
<p>I forgot that I can get traffic from search engines, backlinks, etc. <strong>There are other ways to promote my blog</strong>. I can comment on other blogs, talk about it in forums, promote it on micro-blogging sites like <a href="http://www.plurk.com">Plurk</a>, etc, etc. I was obsessed. Obsessed with the traffic from social bookmarking sites. It was like everything to me. It was as if my blog&#8217;s success depended on that traffic. But, the good thing is that I snapped out of it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that I could help a few people <strong>snap out of this obsession</strong>. Open your eyes and think about it. Don&#8217;t go crazy for the traffic from social bookmarking sites. If you don&#8217;t go popular there then its not the end of the world. Build a great site, have quality content, and be optimistic.</p>
<p>Before you get me wrong, let me tell you that I&#8217;m not saying that you should stop using social bookmarking sites or anything. Think of the traffic from social bookmarking sites as a gift. Don&#8217;t fight for the gift. You&#8217;ll get it if you&#8217;ve done a good job.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-611"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webrampage.com/2008/08/08/obsessed-with-social-bookmarking-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
